Ввязаться: to meddle, get involved , get entangled, take on
A couple of
weeks ago Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov made a statement about Russia’s
involvement in the war in Donbass. Several correspondents and commentators
immediately wrote that he had admitted military involvement, but then a chorus
of Russian speakers and translators said he hadn’t.
So did he
or didn’t he? You’d think it would be simple. But it’s not — and it’s a good
example of the difficulties and duties of translation.
Lavrov was
speaking at the second Primakov Lectures in Moscow. In response to a question
about Russia “punching above its weight” in international relations, Lavrov
said: Я читал и
до сих пор
слышу критику о
том, что мы
зря ввязались в
конфликт на Донбассе, зря ввязались в Сирийский конфликт (I’ve
read and continue to hear criticism that we shouldn’t have gotten involved in
the conflict in Donbass, we shouldn’t haven’t gotten involved in the Syrian
conflict.)
There are
two key words in this statement. The first is конфликт (conflict), which can mean
anything from a disagreement over paint color for the kitchen to a world war.
But it’s
the second word that caused most of the difficulties: ввязаться. It comes from a verb that means to
tie and has the sense of getting entangled, tied up and stuck in something.
You can get
involved in just about anything with this verb, like a conversation: Я пожалел, что вообще ввязался в этот
разговор (I was sorry that I even got involved in that discussion.) Or a big task:
Засучив рукава он
ввязался в организацию института (He
rolled up his sleeves and took on the task of setting up the institute.) Or a risk:
Он удивился, что мы ввязались в
эту авантюру (He was amazed that we jumped into
such a risky project.)
In general,
ввязаться is used for
involvement in something difficult or unpleasant. Надо было спешно уходить, чтобы не
ввязаться в дурацкую историю (We
had to get out of there fast to avoid getting caught up in some idiotic
situation.) Простите, что ввязался в
бессмысленную дискуссию (Forgive me for getting involved in
that pointless discussion.)
And then ввязаться is also used to describe
getting into any kind of fight — with a person, group or nation. Он ввязался в потасовку с
полицейскими (He got into
a fight with a policeman.) Ввяжусь
в драку, мне набьют рожу (If I get into a fight, they’ll smash
my face in.) Князь Дмитрий Донской ввязался в вооруженную борьбу против Крымского ханства (Prince
Dmitry Donskoi took up arms against the Crimean Khanate.) Зря Китай ввязался в эту
войну (China shouldn’t
have gotten involved in that war.) Ввязаться в войну легче, чем из неё
выйти (It’s
easier to get into a war than it is to get out of one.)
Now we go back
to what Lavrov said: мы зря ввязались в конфликт на
Донбассе, зря ввязались в Сирийский конфликт (… we shouldn’t have gotten involved in the
conflict in Donbass and shouldn’t have gotten involved in the Syrian conflict.)
Since Russia is involved militarily in the Syrian conflict, by using the same verb
about Donbass, it seems clear that he is admitting military involvement there, too.
Could he
mean involvement in negotiations or discussions about Donbass? That’s how his
statement was spun by the ministry the next day. But it’s unlikely, first because
negotiations are a good thing and ввязаться is generally used with bad things. And second, that
interpretation doesn’t make sense within the context of the entire sentence —
and reality. The sentence begins: Я читал и до сих пор слышу критику о том (I’ve
read and still hear criticism about…) Is the world criticizing Russia for
being a party to negotiations over the conflict in Donbass? No, the criticism
is over military involvement.
So he admitted
it, right?
Alas, no.
Without a
word that unambiguously means military action, Lavrov’s statement is open to
interpretation. As the lawyers say, you can make a case that he meant something
else. Besides, to be fair, he was speaking off the cuff. People get tired, they
misspeak, they use the wrong word, they call their wife by the name of their
daughter or say they are going to Brazil when they mean Brazaville.
So here
translators have to be as non-specific in English as Lavrov was in Russian: “involvement
in the conflicts.”
What did he
really mean? Only he knows.
Michele A.
Berdy is a Moscow-based translator and interpreter, author of “The Russian
Word’s Worth,” a collection of her columns. Follow her on Twitter
@MicheleBerdy.
